2006 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1967 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2006 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jeep Wrangler (175 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 630 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Jeep Wrangler (296 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Jeep Wrangler | 1967 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | Wrangler | Cosmo |
Year Released | 2006 | 1967 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3960 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 296 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 57 L |