2006 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1980 Mazda 323
To start off, 2006 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jeep Wrangler (175 HP) has 101 more horse power than 1980 Mazda 323. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1980 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 690 kg more than 1980 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Jeep Wrangler (296 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 180 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mazda 323. (116 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Jeep Wrangler | 1980 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | Wrangler | 323 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3960 cc | 1490 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 296 Nm | 116 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 98.5 mm | 77.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.7 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 45 L |