2006 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1994 Rover 200
To start off, 2006 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover 200 would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1994 Rover 200. (66 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1994 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 335 kg more than 1994 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Rover 200. (123 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2006 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Jeep Wrangler | 1994 Rover 200 | |
| Make | Jeep | Rover |
| Model | Wrangler | 200 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3966 cc | 1905 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 66 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 123 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2300 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1545 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3940 mm | 4230 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1410 mm |
