2006 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1999 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2006 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Falcon (220 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 2006 Jeep Wrangler. (175 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2006 Jeep Wrangler. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 65 kg more than 1999 Ford Falcon.
Because 2006 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Falcon (366 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Jeep Wrangler. (296 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1999 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Jeep Wrangler. 1999 Ford Falcon has automatic transmission and 2006 Jeep Wrangler has manual transmission. 2006 Jeep Wrangler will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Ford Falcon will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Jeep Wrangler | 1999 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Jeep | Ford |
Model | Wrangler | Falcon |
Year Released | 2006 | 1999 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2964 cc | 3984 cc |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 296 Nm | 366 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 98.4 mm | 92.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.7 mm | 99.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 9.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1505 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 9.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 62 L |