2006 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1999 Mercedes-Benz C 112
To start off, 2006 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mercedes-Benz C 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mercedes-Benz C 112 would be higher. At 5,987 cc (12 cylinders), 1999 Mercedes-Benz C 112 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mercedes-Benz C 112 (403 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 228 more horse power than 2006 Jeep Wrangler. (175 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mercedes-Benz C 112 should accelerate faster than 2006 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 2006 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Mercedes-Benz C 112. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mercedes-Benz C 112 (580 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 284 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Jeep Wrangler. (296 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1999 Mercedes-Benz C 112 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Jeep Wrangler | 1999 Mercedes-Benz C 112 | |
Make | Jeep | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Wrangler | C 112 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2964 cc | 5987 cc |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 403 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 296 Nm | 580 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2710 mm |