2006 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2000 Lada Samara
To start off, 2006 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Lada Samara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Lada Samara would be higher. At 2,425 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jeep Wrangler (147 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 2000 Lada Samara. (76 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2000 Lada Samara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 461 kg more than 2000 Lada Samara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Lada Samara. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Jeep Wrangler (224 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lada Samara. (116 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lada Samara.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Jeep Wrangler | 2000 Lada Samara | |
Make | Jeep | Lada |
Model | Wrangler | Samara |
Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2425 cc | 1499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 147 HP | 76 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 224 Nm | 116 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 71 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1451 kg | 990 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3940 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 5.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 10 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 7.3 L/100km |