2006 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2008 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2008 Toyota Condor is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 2,964 cc, 2006 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Condor weights approximately 76 kg more than 2006 Jeep Wrangler.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Jeep Wrangler (296 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Toyota Condor. (195 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2006 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Toyota Condor.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Jeep Wrangler | 2008 Toyota Condor | |
Make | Jeep | Toyota |
Model | Wrangler | Condor |
Year Released | 2006 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2964 cc | 2436 cc |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 296 Nm | 195 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 98.4 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.7 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 8.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1646 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 5020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 70 L |