2006 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2010 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2010 Ford Ecosport is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jeep Wrangler (175 HP) has 66 more horse power than 2010 Ford Ecosport. (109 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Ecosport.
Because 2006 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Ford Ecosport. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Jeep Wrangler | 2010 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Jeep | Ford |
| Model | Wrangler | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3966 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 109 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2490 mm |
