2006 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2012 Lincoln MKZ
To start off, 2012 Lincoln MKZ is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 2,964 cc, 2006 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Lincoln MKZ weights approximately 132 kg more than 2006 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 2006 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Lincoln MKZ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Jeep Wrangler | 2012 Lincoln MKZ | |
| Make | Jeep | Lincoln |
| Model | Wrangler | MKZ |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2964 cc | 2500 cc |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1702 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4821 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1834 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2728 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 66 L |
