2006 Kia Cerato vs. 2012 Ford Falcon

To start off, 2012 Ford Falcon is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Kia Cerato. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Kia Cerato would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Falcon (240 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 2006 Kia Cerato. (104 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2006 Kia Cerato. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford Falcon weights approximately 395 kg more than 2006 Kia Cerato. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2012 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Kia Cerato, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford Falcon (353 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 210 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Kia Cerato. (143 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2012 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Kia Cerato.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Kia Cerato 2012 Ford Falcon
Make Kia Ford
Model Cerato Falcon
Year Released 2006 2012
Body Type Hatchback Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1597 cc 1999 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 104 HP 240 HP
Engine RPM 5800 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 143 Nm 353 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 2000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 75.5 mm 87.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 87 mm 83.1 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 9.3:1
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1253 kg 1648 kg
Vehicle Length 4350 mm 4967 mm
Vehicle Width 1740 mm 1868 mm
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1433 mm
Wheelbase Size 2620 mm 2838 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 6.8 L/100km 8.5 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 55 L 68 L