2006 Kia Magentis vs. 1980 Volvo 260
To start off, 2006 Kia Magentis is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 260. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 260 would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Kia Magentis is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Kia Magentis (165 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 260. (81 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Kia Magentis should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 260.
Because 1980 Volvo 260 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 260. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Kia Magentis, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Kia Magentis (230 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 260. (140 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2006 Kia Magentis will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 260.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Kia Magentis | 1980 Volvo 260 | |
Make | Kia | Volvo |
Model | Magentis | 260 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 2383 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 230 Nm | 140 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 23.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2660 mm |