2006 Kia Optima vs. 1963 Rover P5
To start off, 2006 Kia Optima is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Rover P5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Rover P5 would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Rover P5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Kia Optima (138 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1963 Rover P5. (119 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Kia Optima should accelerate faster than 1963 Rover P5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Kia Optima weights approximately 280 kg more than 1963 Rover P5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Rover P5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Rover P5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Kia Optima, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Rover P5 (218 Nm @ 2650 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Kia Optima. (199 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1963 Rover P5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Kia Optima. 1963 Rover P5 has automatic transmission and 2006 Kia Optima has manual transmission. 2006 Kia Optima will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1963 Rover P5 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Kia Optima | 1963 Rover P5 | |
Make | Kia | Rover |
Model | Optima | P5 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2351 cc | 2993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 199 Nm | 218 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2650 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86.5 mm | 77.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 105 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2820 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 45 L |