2006 Kia Optima vs. 1967 Renault 4
To start off, 2006 Kia Optima is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Renault 4 would be higher. At 2,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Kia Optima is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Kia Optima (138 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1967 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Kia Optima should accelerate faster than 1967 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Kia Optima weights approximately 1354 kg more than 1967 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Kia Optima | 1967 Renault 4 | |
Make | Kia | Renault |
Model | Optima | 4 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2360 cc | 747 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2004 kg | 650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.4 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 38 L |