2006 Kia Optima vs. 1994 Lancia Zeta
To start off, 2006 Kia Optima is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Lancia Zeta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Lancia Zeta would be higher. At 2,351 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Kia Optima is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Kia Optima (138 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1994 Lancia Zeta. (89 HP @ 4100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Kia Optima should accelerate faster than 1994 Lancia Zeta.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Kia Optima (199 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Lancia Zeta. (182 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2006 Kia Optima will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Lancia Zeta. 1994 Lancia Zeta has automatic transmission and 2006 Kia Optima has manual transmission. 2006 Kia Optima will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1994 Lancia Zeta will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Kia Optima | 1994 Lancia Zeta | |
Make | Kia | Lancia |
Model | Optima | Zeta |
Year Released | 2006 | 1994 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2351 cc | 1929 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Torque | 199 Nm | 182 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |