2006 Kia Optima vs. 2009 Nissan Note
To start off, 2009 Nissan Note is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Kia Optima. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Kia Optima would be higher. At 2,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Kia Optima is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Kia Optima (138 HP) has 49 more horse power than 2009 Nissan Note. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Kia Optima should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan Note. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Kia Optima weights approximately 952 kg more than 2009 Nissan Note. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Kia Optima | 2009 Nissan Note | |
| Make | Kia | Nissan |
| Model | Optima | Note |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2360 cc | 1386 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 89 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2004 kg | 1052 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4083 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1691 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2600 mm |
