2006 Kia Optima vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Kia Optima. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Kia Optima would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Kia Optima weights approximately 526 kg more than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Because 2013 Mini Countryman is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Kia Optima. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Countryman (240 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Kia Optima. (199 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Mini Countryman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Kia Optima.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Kia Optima | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | Kia | Mini |
Model | Optima | Countryman |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 199 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 85 mm |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2004 kg | 1478 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1561 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2595 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 7.8 L/100km | 6.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10.7 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 47 L |