2006 Kia Rio vs. 2005 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2006 Kia Rio is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 1,399 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Kia Rio is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2005 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Kia Rio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Kia Rio | 2005 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | Kia | MCC |
Model | Rio | Crossblade |
Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 1399 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 70 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |