2006 Kia Sedona vs. 1960 Mini MK I
To start off, 2006 Kia Sedona is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Mini MK I would be higher. At 3,785 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Kia Sedona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Kia Sedona (244 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 210 more horse power than 1960 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Kia Sedona should accelerate faster than 1960 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Kia Sedona weights approximately 865 kg more than 1960 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Kia Sedona (343 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 283 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Mini MK I. (60 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2006 Kia Sedona will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Mini MK I.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Kia Sedona | 1960 Mini MK I | |
| Make | Kia | Mini |
| Model | Sedona | MK I |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3785 cc | 848 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 244 HP | 34 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 343 Nm | 60 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 615 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 3060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2040 mm |
