2006 Kia Sedona vs. 1971 ZAZ 966
To start off, 2006 Kia Sedona is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 3,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Kia Sedona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Kia Sedona (195 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 1971 ZAZ 966. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Kia Sedona should accelerate faster than 1971 ZAZ 966.
Because 1971 ZAZ 966 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 ZAZ 966. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Kia Sedona, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Kia Sedona (296 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 244 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 ZAZ 966. (52 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2006 Kia Sedona will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Kia Sedona | 1971 ZAZ 966 | |
Make | Kia | ZAZ |
Model | Sedona | 966 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1971 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3497 cc | 885 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 27 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 296 Nm | 52 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85.8 mm | 54.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2170 mm |