2006 Kia Sedona vs. 1985 Ford Tempo
To start off, 2006 Kia Sedona is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 3,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Kia Sedona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Kia Sedona (195 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1985 Ford Tempo. (90 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Kia Sedona should accelerate faster than 1985 Ford Tempo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Kia Sedona (296 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Ford Tempo. (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2006 Kia Sedona will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Kia Sedona | 1985 Ford Tempo | |
Make | Kia | Ford |
Model | Sedona | Tempo |
Year Released | 2006 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3497 cc | 2307 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 296 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85.8 mm | 79.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2540 mm |