2006 Kia Sedona vs. 1985 Maserati Bi Turbo
To start off, 2006 Kia Sedona is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Maserati Bi Turbo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Maserati Bi Turbo would be higher. At 3,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Kia Sedona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Kia Sedona (195 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1985 Maserati Bi Turbo. (182 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Kia Sedona should accelerate faster than 1985 Maserati Bi Turbo.
Because 1985 Maserati Bi Turbo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1985 Maserati Bi Turbo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Kia Sedona, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Maserati Bi Turbo (305 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Kia Sedona. (296 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1985 Maserati Bi Turbo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Kia Sedona.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Kia Sedona | 1985 Maserati Bi Turbo | |
Make | Kia | Maserati |
Model | Sedona | Bi Turbo |
Year Released | 2006 | 1985 |
Engine Size | 3497 cc | 2490 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 182 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 296 Nm | 305 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2510 mm |