2006 Kia Sedona vs. 2002 Volvo S60

To start off, 2006 Kia Sedona is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Volvo S60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Volvo S60 would be higher. At 3,785 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Kia Sedona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volvo S60 (295 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 2006 Kia Sedona. (244 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 2006 Kia Sedona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Kia Sedona weights approximately 29 kg more than 2002 Volvo S60.

Because 2002 Volvo S60 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Kia Sedona. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volvo S60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Volvo S60 (400 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Kia Sedona. (343 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2002 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Kia Sedona.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Kia Sedona 2002 Volvo S60
Make Kia Volvo
Model Sedona S60
Year Released 2006 2002
Body Type Minivan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3785 cc 2435 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 5 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 244 HP 295 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5250 RPM
Torque 343 Nm 400 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 1950 RPM
Drive Type Front 4WD
Number of Seats 7 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1480 kg 1451 kg
Vehicle Length 5140 mm 4610 mm
Vehicle Width 1990 mm 1810 mm
Wheelbase Size 3030 mm 2720 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 80 L 68 L