2006 Kia Sedona vs. 2004 Rover 75
To start off, 2006 Kia Sedona is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Rover 75 would be higher. At 3,785 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Kia Sedona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Kia Sedona (244 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 2004 Rover 75. (129 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Kia Sedona should accelerate faster than 2004 Rover 75. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Rover 75 weights approximately 80 kg more than 2006 Kia Sedona.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Kia Sedona (343 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Rover 75. (240 Nm @ 1900 RPM). This means 2006 Kia Sedona will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Kia Sedona | 2004 Rover 75 | |
Make | Kia | Rover |
Model | Sedona | 75 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3785 cc | 1951 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 244 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 343 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1900 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 65 L |