2006 Kia Sedona vs. 2006 Holden Epica
To start off, both 2006 Kia Sedona and 2006 Holden Epica were released in the same year (2006). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 2,902 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Kia Sedona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 11 more horse power than 2006 Kia Sedona. (142 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 2006 Kia Sedona.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Kia Sedona (310 Nm) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 2006 Kia Sedona will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Kia Sedona | 2006 Holden Epica | |
Make | Kia | Holden |
Model | Sedona | Epica |
Year Released | 2006 | 2006 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2902 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 142 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 310 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |