2006 Kia Sedona vs. 2011 Chrysler 200
To start off, 2011 Chrysler 200 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Kia Sedona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Kia Sedona would be higher. At 3,785 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Kia Sedona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Chrysler 200 (283 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 2006 Kia Sedona. (244 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Chrysler 200 should accelerate faster than 2006 Kia Sedona.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Chrysler 200 (352 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Kia Sedona. (343 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2011 Chrysler 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Kia Sedona.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Kia Sedona | 2011 Chrysler 200 | |
Make | Kia | Chrysler |
Model | Sedona | 200 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3785 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 244 HP | 283 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 343 Nm | 352 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4948 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2766 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.4 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 64 L |