2006 Kia Sedona vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Kia Sedona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Kia Sedona would be higher. At 3,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Kia Sedona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Kia Sedona (245 HP) has 92 more horse power than 2012 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Kia Sedona should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Epica.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Kia Sedona (343 Nm) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 2006 Kia Sedona will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Kia Sedona | 2012 Holden Epica | |
Make | Kia | Holden |
Model | Sedona | Epica |
Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3786 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 245 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 343 Nm | 237 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |