2006 Kia Sportage vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2006 Kia Sportage is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda CU-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda CU-X would be higher. At 1,975 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Kia Sportage is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Kia Sportage (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Kia Sportage should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Kia Sportage weights approximately 204 kg more than 2001 Mazda CU-X. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Kia Sportage is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Mazda CU-X. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Kia Sportage will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda CU-X (240 Nm) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Kia Sportage. (188 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda CU-X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Kia Sportage.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Kia Sportage | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
Make | Kia | Mazda |
Model | Sportage | CU-X |
Year Released | 2006 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1975 cc | 1970 cc |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 188 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1549 kg | 1345 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 80 L |