2006 Lada 2111 vs. 2012 Holden UTE
To start off, 2012 Holden UTE is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Lada 2111. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Lada 2111 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 268 more horse power than 2006 Lada 2111. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2006 Lada 2111.
Because 2012 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Lada 2111, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 399 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Lada 2111. (131 Nm). This means 2012 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Lada 2111.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Lada 2111 | 2012 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Lada | Holden |
| Model | 2111 | UTE |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 357 HP |
| Torque | 131 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
