2006 Lada Niva vs. 1999 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2006 Lada Niva is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 1,832 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Toyota Celica (129 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 2006 Lada Niva. (81 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 2006 Lada Niva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Lada Niva weights approximately 145 kg more than 1999 Toyota Celica.
Because 2006 Lada Niva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Toyota Celica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Lada Niva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Toyota Celica (171 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Lada Niva. (129 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1999 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Lada Niva.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Lada Niva | 1999 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Lada | Toyota |
Model | Niva | Celica |
Year Released | 2006 | 1999 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1690 cc | 1832 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 129 Nm | 171 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 91.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 137 km/hour | 204 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 19 seconds | 8.7 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1285 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.4 L/100km | 6.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 55 L |