2006 Lada Niva vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2006 Lada Niva is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda CU-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda CU-X would be higher. At 1,970 cc, 2001 Mazda CU-X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mazda CU-X (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 2006 Lada Niva. (81 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X should accelerate faster than 2006 Lada Niva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda CU-X weights approximately 60 kg more than 2006 Lada Niva. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Lada Niva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Mazda CU-X. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Lada Niva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda CU-X (240 Nm) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Lada Niva. (129 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda CU-X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Lada Niva. 2001 Mazda CU-X has automatic transmission and 2006 Lada Niva has manual transmission. 2006 Lada Niva will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Mazda CU-X will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Lada Niva | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
Make | Lada | Mazda |
Model | Niva | CU-X |
Year Released | 2006 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1690 cc | 1970 cc |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 129 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1285 kg | 1345 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 80 L |