2006 Lada Niva vs. 2011 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2011 Nissan Pixo is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Lada Niva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Lada Niva would be higher. At 1,690 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Lada Niva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Lada Niva (81 HP) has 13 more horse power than 2011 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Lada Niva should accelerate faster than 2011 Nissan Pixo.
Because 2006 Lada Niva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Nissan Pixo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Lada Niva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Lada Niva | 2011 Nissan Pixo | |
| Make | Lada | Nissan |
| Model | Niva | Pixo |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2011 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1690 cc | 996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 68 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 137 km/hour | 155 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 19 seconds | 13.5 seconds |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 3580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2360 mm |
