2006 Lada Niva vs. 2012 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2012 Nissan Micra is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Lada Niva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Lada Niva would be higher. At 1,690 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Lada Niva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Lada Niva (81 HP) has 2 more horse power than 2012 Nissan Micra. (79 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Lada Niva should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan Micra.
Because 2006 Lada Niva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Nissan Micra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Lada Niva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Lada Niva (129 Nm) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 2006 Lada Niva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Lada Niva | 2012 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Lada | Nissan |
Model | Niva | Micra |
Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1690 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 129 Nm | 108 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1666 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1514 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2449 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.4 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 46 L |