2006 Lancia Lybra vs. 1967 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2006 Lancia Lybra is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1967 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Lancia Lybra (129 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Lancia Lybra should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Lancia Lybra weights approximately 435 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Lancia Lybra (156 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Lancia Lybra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Lancia Lybra | 1967 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Lancia | Mazda |
Model | Lybra | Cosmo |
Year Released | 2006 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1746 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 156 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1375 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 57 L |