2006 Lancia Phedra vs. 1986 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 2006 Lancia Phedra is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,354 cc, 1986 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Mazda RX-7 (185 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 2006 Lancia Phedra. (134 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 2006 Lancia Phedra.
Because 1986 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Lancia Phedra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Mazda RX-7 (246 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Lancia Phedra. (190 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 1986 Mazda RX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Lancia Phedra.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Lancia Phedra | 1986 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Lancia | Mazda |
Model | Phedra | RX-7 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1986 |
Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 2354 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 246 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Top Speed | 185 km/hour | 230 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2430 mm |