2006 Land Rover Defender vs. 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste
To start off, 2006 Land Rover Defender is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste would be higher. At 2,495 cc, 2006 Land Rover Defender is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Land Rover Defender weights approximately 1152 kg more than 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste.
Because 2006 Land Rover Defender is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover Defender will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Land Rover Defender (300 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 169 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste. (131 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2006 Land Rover Defender will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Land Rover Defender | 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste | |
Make | Land Rover | Mitsubishi |
Model | Defender | Celeste |
Year Released | 2006 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2495 cc | 1595 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 85 HP |
Torque | 300 Nm | 131 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 2082 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2350 mm |