2006 Land Rover Defender vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 2006 Land Rover Defender is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 2,498 cc, 2006 Land Rover Defender is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Land Rover Defender weights approximately 630 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102.
Because 2006 Land Rover Defender is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Zastava 102. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover Defender will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Land Rover Defender | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Land Rover | Zastava |
| Model | Defender | 102 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 2498 cc | 1302 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 67 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1404 kg | 774 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2160 mm |
