2006 Land Rover Defender vs. 1995 Mazda RX-01
To start off, 2006 Land Rover Defender is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 2,614 cc, 1995 Mazda RX-01 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Land Rover Defender weights approximately 982 kg more than 1995 Mazda RX-01.
Because 2006 Land Rover Defender is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Mazda RX-01. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover Defender will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Land Rover Defender (300 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda RX-01. (216 Nm @ 6000 RPM). This means 2006 Land Rover Defender will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda RX-01.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Land Rover Defender | 1995 Mazda RX-01 | |
Make | Land Rover | Mazda |
Model | Defender | RX-01 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2495 cc | 2614 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 220 HP |
Torque | 300 Nm | 216 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 19.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2082 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 65 L |