2006 Land Rover Defender vs. 1996 Proton 400
To start off, 2006 Land Rover Defender is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Proton 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Proton 400 would be higher. At 2,495 cc (5 cylinders), 2006 Land Rover Defender is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Land Rover Defender (120 HP @ 1950 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1996 Proton 400. (114 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover Defender should accelerate faster than 1996 Proton 400.
Because 2006 Land Rover Defender is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Proton 400. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover Defender will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Land Rover Defender (300 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Proton 400. (160 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Land Rover Defender will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Proton 400.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Land Rover Defender | 1996 Proton 400 | |
Make | Land Rover | Proton |
Model | Defender | 400 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2495 cc | 1834 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 1950 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2070 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2510 mm |