2006 Land Rover LR3 vs. 1958 Mercedes-Benz 300D
To start off, 2006 Land Rover LR3 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Mercedes-Benz 300D. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Mercedes-Benz 300D would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Land Rover LR3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Land Rover LR3 (300 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1958 Mercedes-Benz 300D. (158 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover LR3 should accelerate faster than 1958 Mercedes-Benz 300D. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Land Rover LR3 weights approximately 531 kg more than 1958 Mercedes-Benz 300D. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Land Rover LR3 | 1958 Mercedes-Benz 300D | |
| Make | Land Rover | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | LR3 | 300D |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4392 cc | 2996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2461 kg | 1930 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 5200 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3160 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 86 L | 71 L |
