2006 Land Rover LR3 vs. 1965 MG MGC
To start off, 2006 Land Rover LR3 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 MG MGC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 MG MGC would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Land Rover LR3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Land Rover LR3 (216 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1965 MG MGC. (148 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover LR3 should accelerate faster than 1965 MG MGC.
Because 2006 Land Rover LR3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 MG MGC. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover LR3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Land Rover LR3 (365 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 191 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 MG MGC. (174 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Land Rover LR3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 MG MGC.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Land Rover LR3 | 1965 MG MGC | |
Make | Land Rover | MG |
Model | LR3 | MGC |
Year Released | 2006 | 1965 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4015 cc | 2912 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 216 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 365 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2560 mm |