2006 Land Rover LR3 vs. 1965 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 2006 Land Rover LR3 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Land Rover LR3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Land Rover LR3 (300 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. (163 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover LR3 should accelerate faster than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Land Rover LR3 weights approximately 1321 kg more than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Land Rover LR3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover LR3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Land Rover LR3 | 1965 Sunbeam Tiger | |
Make | Land Rover | Sunbeam |
Model | LR3 | Tiger |
Year Released | 2006 | 1965 |
Body Type | SUV | Roadster |
Engine Size | 4392 cc | 4261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2461 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2190 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 86 L | 27 L |