2006 Land Rover LR3 vs. 1966 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2006 Land Rover LR3 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Land Rover LR3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Land Rover LR3 (216 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 198 more horse power than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover LR3 should accelerate faster than 1966 Suzuki Fronte.
Because 2006 Land Rover LR3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover LR3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Land Rover LR3 (365 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 333 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2006 Land Rover LR3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Land Rover LR3 | 1966 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Land Rover | Suzuki |
Model | LR3 | Fronte |
Year Released | 2006 | 1966 |
Engine Size | 4015 cc | 360 cc |
Horse Power | 216 HP | 18 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 365 Nm | 32 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 3000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 86 L | 66 L |