2006 Land Rover LR3 vs. 1983 Nissan Prairie
To start off, 2006 Land Rover LR3 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Nissan Prairie. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Nissan Prairie would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Land Rover LR3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Land Rover LR3 (216 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 1983 Nissan Prairie. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover LR3 should accelerate faster than 1983 Nissan Prairie.
Because 2006 Land Rover LR3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Nissan Prairie. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover LR3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Land Rover LR3 (365 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 243 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Nissan Prairie. (122 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 Land Rover LR3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Nissan Prairie.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Land Rover LR3 | 1983 Nissan Prairie | |
Make | Land Rover | Nissan |
Model | LR3 | Prairie |
Year Released | 2006 | 1983 |
Engine Size | 4015 cc | 1487 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 216 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 365 Nm | 122 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2520 mm |