2006 Land Rover LR3 vs. 1983 Renault 14
To start off, 2006 Land Rover LR3 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Renault 14. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Renault 14 would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Land Rover LR3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Land Rover LR3 (216 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 1983 Renault 14. (57 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover LR3 should accelerate faster than 1983 Renault 14.
Because 2006 Land Rover LR3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Renault 14. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover LR3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Land Rover LR3 (365 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 272 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Renault 14. (93 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Land Rover LR3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Renault 14.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Land Rover LR3 | 1983 Renault 14 | |
Make | Land Rover | Renault |
Model | LR3 | 14 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1983 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4015 cc | 1218 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 216 HP | 57 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 365 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 86 L | 48 L |