2006 Land Rover LR3 vs. 1983 Toyota Corona
To start off, 2006 Land Rover LR3 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Toyota Corona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Toyota Corona would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Land Rover LR3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Land Rover LR3 (216 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1983 Toyota Corona. (116 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover LR3 should accelerate faster than 1983 Toyota Corona.
Because 2006 Land Rover LR3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Toyota Corona. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover LR3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Land Rover LR3 (365 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Toyota Corona. (198 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2006 Land Rover LR3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Toyota Corona.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Land Rover LR3 | 1983 Toyota Corona | |
Make | Land Rover | Toyota |
Model | LR3 | Corona |
Year Released | 2006 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4015 cc | 2366 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 216 HP | 116 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 365 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2510 mm |