2006 Land Rover LR3 vs. 1986 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 2006 Land Rover LR3 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Land Rover LR3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Land Rover LR3 weights approximately 1357 kg more than 1986 Toyota Lite Ace.
Because 2006 Land Rover LR3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Toyota Lite Ace. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover LR3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Land Rover LR3 | 1986 Toyota Lite Ace | |
Make | Land Rover | Toyota |
Model | LR3 | Lite Ace |
Year Released | 2006 | 1986 |
Engine Size | 4392 cc | 1453 cc |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2461 kg | 1104 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1910 mm |