2006 Land Rover LR3 vs. 1995 Rover 200
To start off, 2006 Land Rover LR3 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 200 would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Land Rover LR3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Land Rover LR3 (300 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 1995 Rover 200. (197 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover LR3 should accelerate faster than 1995 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Land Rover LR3 weights approximately 1276 kg more than 1995 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Land Rover LR3 (427 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 194 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover 200. (233 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 2006 Land Rover LR3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Land Rover LR3 | 1995 Rover 200 | |
Make | Land Rover | Rover |
Model | LR3 | 200 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4392 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 427 Nm | 233 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 84.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 8.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2461 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1410 mm |