2006 Land Rover LR3 vs. 1997 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2006 Land Rover LR3 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Land Rover LR3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Land Rover LR3 (216 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1997 Ford Falcon. (205 HP @ 4900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover LR3 should accelerate faster than 1997 Ford Falcon.
Because 2006 Land Rover LR3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover LR3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Land Rover LR3 (365 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Ford Falcon. (357 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Land Rover LR3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Ford Falcon.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Land Rover LR3 | 1997 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Land Rover | Ford |
Model | LR3 | Falcon |
Year Released | 2006 | 1997 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4015 cc | 3984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 216 HP | 205 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 365 Nm | 357 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2800 mm |