2006 Land Rover LR3 vs. 2002 MG TF
To start off, 2006 Land Rover LR3 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 MG TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 MG TF would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Land Rover LR3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Land Rover LR3 (216 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 2002 MG TF. (114 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover LR3 should accelerate faster than 2002 MG TF.
Because 2006 Land Rover LR3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 MG TF. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover LR3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Land Rover LR3 (365 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MG TF. (165 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Land Rover LR3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MG TF.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Land Rover LR3 | 2002 MG TF | |
Make | Land Rover | MG |
Model | LR3 | TF |
Year Released | 2006 | 2002 |
Body Type | SUV | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 4015 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 216 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 365 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 86 L | 50 L |