2006 Land Rover LR3 vs. 2005 Proton Gen-2
To start off, 2006 Land Rover LR3 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Proton Gen-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Proton Gen-2 would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Land Rover LR3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Land Rover LR3 (300 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 192 more horse power than 2005 Proton Gen-2. (108 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover LR3 should accelerate faster than 2005 Proton Gen-2.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Land Rover LR3 (427 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 279 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Proton Gen-2. (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Land Rover LR3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Proton Gen-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Land Rover LR3 | 2005 Proton Gen-2 | |
| Make | Land Rover | Proton |
| Model | LR3 | Gen-2 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Size | 4392 cc | 1597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 427 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2610 mm |
